via National Geographic
After
the feds seized and shuttered Silk Road, an online marketplace for
illegal drugs, earlier this month, some technology experts started
sounding the death knell for Bitcoin, Silk Road's international currency
of choice. Instead, we may soon see Bitcoin's real value.
Invented
in 2008, Bitcoin is not the first attempt at an all-digital,
cryptographically based currency. Others have existed in one form or
another for nearly fifty years, but have either failed to take off or
dramatically crashed and burned. Bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency
with the deep structure, wide adoption, and trading momentum to achieve
escape velocity.
In practice, Bitcoin blends credit
cards' ease of digital transfer with the relative anonymity of a cash
handoff. Like all currencies, the problems it poses are both practical
and metaphysical; like cash or credit, Bitcoin is somehow both more and
less real than the goods it is traded for.
Until now,
the most well-known of these goods have been illegal drugs, like those
on Silk Road. But the drug marketplace's shutdown gives Bitcoin a
chance to gain some much-needed legitimacy. "It's a watershed moment
for Bitcoin," Marco Santori, the chairman of the regulatory-affairs
committee of the Bitcoin Foundation, told The New Yorker. "Bitcoin's PR problem, with which it has struggled for the last year or so, is being addressed in a very direct way."
Bitcoin's future potential was a hot topic this week at emTech,
an MIT conference on emerging technologies. In a panel hosted by MIT
Technology Review's Tom Simonite, MIT economist David Johnson and BitPay
CEO Stephen Pair discussed Bitcoin's complex relationship with paper
currencies, credit, and state authority.
Johnson noted
that buyers and sellers, banks and governments all care deeply about
what money is used for. Money's use carries associations of value,
which in turn helps establish whether a currency, a payment form, and a
social model for transactions are legitimate. "It's hard to bring any
of them on board if the money is associated with behaviors consumers
are troubled by," Johnson said at emTech.
"The key to
the legitimacy of the system for all of these parties is to establish
that people using the system are acting legally and responsibly."
In
turn, Pair denied that Silk Road's association with Bitcoin would
prove fatal to the cryptocurrency. "Silk Road used a lot of
technologies. First, it used the Internet. It also used Tor [a network
using "onion routing" relays to conceal a user's location identity] for
anonymity. And then it used Bitcoin for payments," said Pair. Silk
Road's shutdown "shows that just because you use Bitcoin doesn't mean
you can evade law enforcement."
If until now, Bitcoin has been a notorious outlier, this is its chance to redefine itself as a mainstream contender.
What is Bitcoin For?
If it's not to move drugs or launder money, what is Bitcoin for?
Let's
assume that the Silk Road arrests halt or at least slow Bitcoin's use
at the fringes of the law, at least until those actors tighten up and
regroup (and law enforcement does the same). Let's further stipulate
that the number of people interested in Bitcoin as an academic exercise
or as an ideological argument about fiat currencies has (like the
total number of Bitcoins itself) a hard upper limit.
Pair
and Johnson both argue that Bitcoin still has tremendous potential
doing what it was built to do: transfer money from person to person
without stopping for national borders or rent-seeking middlemen. Those
people can be investors, merchants, and even migrant workers, all
participating in one of the largest, strangest, but most elegant
exchanges the world has ever seen.
Bitcoin's Origins
Bitcoin's invention is attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto, a pseudonym for a person or group who, apart from a 2008 paper introducing Bitcoin, have remained anonymous and absent, a virtual author.
Bitcoin
is backed by no government, and its value isn't rooted in precious
metals. Instead, it's distributed across the entire network of users,
its roots in complex digital mathematics. Bitcoin supporters say that
this makes the currency immune to manipulation by politicians or
oligarchs seeking to move its value up or down for politics or profit.
"Bitcoin's
integrity is guaranteed by the rules of math and the laws of physics,"
Pair says. Such rhetoric is common in the world of digital currency,
where reverence for Bitcoin has succeeded gold for many hard-money
enthusiasts. They've entered into an uneasy and unusual alliance with
anarcho-technologists who distrust government authority and believe in
the power of distributed networks and open-source software.
With
governments' financial and credit troubles in turn causing major
problems for their currencies, global investors are looking for
something firmer than the promise of a central bank. In September,
Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss—Facebook bridesmaids turned Bitcoin
entrepreneurs—touted the digital currency as a solution to the world's troubled currency markets. "It's Gold 2.0," Tyler Winklevoss said.
Like
gold or other precious metals used as specie, Bitcoins are scarce. But
their scarcity is algorithmic, as opposed to natural or accidental.
New
Bitcoins are added only by being "mined," in the high-tech equivalent
of a land rush. Computers on the Bitcoin network race to solve
increasingly complicated mathematical problems. The first to do so has
its solution verified by the other nodes on the network. Once verified,
the Bitcoin can be traded using Bitcoin's wallet software.
Bitcoin
mining guarantees a fixed rate of inflation (relative to itself). It
roots the value of Bitcoins in the work needed to solve the puzzle. And
the decentralized proof-of-work consensus protocol guards against
fraud and counterfeit.
In Pair's words, Bitcoin
"commoditized the process of securing the network." All the work done
by financial centers and payment systems to detect fraud or counterfeit
for traditional currency and credit markets is done all along the
network according to the peer-to-peer protocols for Bitcoin. And the
costs of that work are likewise distributed throughout the system, paid
for through Bitcoin mining. This is what lets Bitcoins be traded and
exchanged without huge fees.
There are a little over
11.78 million bitcoins in circulation, with a total capitalization of
1.6 billion USD, and typically somewhere between 50,000 and 70,000
bitcoin transactions each day. As more and more computers participate
in bitcoin mining—daily unique bitcoin addresses reached a high of over
100,000 this summer—and the mathematical problems needed to earn new
bitcoins have grown more complicated, the average operating margin for
miners has plummeted. Mining has switched from being a frontier gold
rush to a relatively mainstream, industrial-grade operation.
Digital Currency's Future
Today,
essentially every digital transaction and every international
transaction involves a use of one form or another of virtual currency
or credit.
Transaction and exchange fees, taxes, and
payment delays exist to provide short-term credit, guard against
counterfeit, excessive withdrawals and other kinds of fraud, and to
extract income. Bitcoin is designed to provide the same security
guarantees and convenience of credit, while foregoing its extra
processing times and fees.
You settle with Bitcoin
immediately, just like cash. Unlike a credit card exchange, where your
credit card number and security information are handed over completely
for any transaction, a transfer is authorized only to pay a specific
amount.
In principle, Bitcoin's independence makes it
more stable than traditional currencies like dollars or euros. In
reality, its value has fluctuated wildly over its four-year-existence.
Today,
the price of one Bitcoin has stabilized at about $140 US; it briefly
dipped down to $121 USD after Silk Road's shutdown, but quickly rallied
back. But just a year ago, the price of a Bitcoin seemed stable at
about $12 USD. Those are some wild swings.
The exchange
values matter, both to people who mine or invest in Bitcoins and to
users who want to use them for everyday goods and services, which are
usually denominated in local currency. (Local currency is also used to
pay taxes, which Bitcoin transactions sometimes try to avoid.)
But
what Bitcoin also does is make digital payments possible for people
who not only don't have PayPal, but don't have a functioning credit
system. In many parts of Africa, Latin America, and south Asia, most
people have no access to credit or digital payments; with Bitcoin, that
infrastructure comes for free.
Pair's company, BitPay,
converts Bitcoins back and forth into various local currencies without
charging a transaction fee. (Instead, it charges a flat monthly rate.)
Its clients include hosting companies, computer and electronic
equipment companies, and companies that sell internationally.
"With
Bitcoin, you can take an international payment with no risk of credit
card fraud," says Pair. "We sometimes forget that there are many
countries where you can't take a credit card payment. Those countries
become isolated from the rest of the Internet economy... For many of
these countries, if this payment system works, if the U.S. and Congress
can support and tolerate a reputable, well-paid industry, this will be
a big connector to the world economy."
The area with
the biggest potential for Bitcoin worldwide is probably international
remittances: money sent home by workers living abroad. Currently, this
money has to be handled by several intermediaries: banks, wire
services, and currency exchanges all take their cut. A recent report by Businessweek
noted that the average fee for remittances was 9 percent of the money
transferred, with conversion to cash often costing an extra 5 percent.
Western Union's profit margins are enormous for an intermediary, nearly
16 percent, and most of its costs are devoted to the technologies
moving money from one place to another, guaranteeing the legitimacy of
the transfer. In short, Western Union spends and earns billions to do
what Bitcoin does for free.
Instead of Western Union,
migrant workers (or businesses operating on their behalf) could use
Bitcoin to send payments from one country to another through email,
without worry of fraud or needing to support an elaborate exchange or
credit market.
It would be real-time, immediate
settlement at a fraction of the cost. In ten years, instead of
international drugs, Bitcoin could act as a genuine lingua franca for
international work.
"The vast majority of the planet don't even own a bank account," Bitcoin evangelist Jonathan Mohan tells PBS Newshour.
"And it's my contention that—and a lot of people think this—that, just
as in Africa, they didn't go to phones. They went directly to cell
phones, that, in the same sort of adoption curve, in these developing
nations, you're not going to see them start getting bank accounts.
You're going to see them just going straight to Bitcoins, because if you
own a Bitcoin address, you have a bank account on your phone that you
can interact on the global stage with."
There are still
real problems. Johnson thinks that Bitcoin has yet to suffer its first
genuine crisis of legitimacy, and its proponents haven't developed a
political strategy to reassure wary states and investors that the
currency can play nice. And the rhetoric of many Bitcoin proponents
assumes a sophisticated understanding of its underlying technology that
is far from widespread, especially among the world's poor.
Investors
and miners can debate the nuances of different cryptographic schema,
but for most of us, money is ultimately an article of faith.
Money 3.0
It seems inevitable that money, already virtual, will only become more so as we shift into a digital economy.
"Money
has become data," Ben Milne, founder of Dwolla, a real-time payments
company, said at emTech. "There needs to be an infrastructure that
allows people to exchange whatever they have for whatever they want,
that confirms who they are, and confirms that the transaction is
legitimate."
He notes that while today, credit cards
handle trillions of dollars in transactions, ACH's virtual transfers
where no physical money changes hands handle tens of trillions. If
digital companies or currencies can make these transactions more
secure, more efficient, and more immediate, that can unlock value for
everyone, even some of the companies that currently benefit from the
high barrier of entry to traditional banking.
And
Bitcoin can still affect the world economy even if it does not become a
currency that everyone uses or understands. "If Bitcoin becomes
widespread, respected, and legitimate, that pressures everyone—all the
central banks and banking companies—to bring down those costs in order
to stay competitive," Johnson says. "Or everyone could just use
Bitcoin," adds Pair.
No comments:
Post a Comment